Measurement and Quality Improvement

Cover image for: Measurement and Quality Improvement
CPDTime.
9m
Updated 15 Apr 2024

Quality. It’s something we all strive for. It’s the optimum level of care experienced by patients.

‘Measurement and quality improvement’ is the second component of Patient Safety and Quality Systems, as outlined by the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards: Standard 1 Clinical Governance.

Why do We Have Patient Safety and Quality Systems?

As part of the governance process of a health service, patient safety and quality systems are created to advance the safety and the quality of patients’ care (ACSQHC 2022a).

The intent of measurement and quality improvement is to implement effective quality improvement systems that operate across the entire organisation (ACSQHC 2021).

The public’s perception of quality in healthcare has assessable consequences. There is growing evidence to indicate that people will avoid using services they deem as lacking in quality (Hanefeld et al. 2017) and that this is ‘a barrier to universal health coverage’, regardless of physical access to care (Berendes et al. 2011).

Nurse presenting information on a device to 2 people
‘Measurement and quality improvement’ is the second component of Patient Safety and Quality Systems, as outlined by NSQHS Standard 1: Clinical Governance.

How Do You Define ‘Quality’?

According to the American Institute of Medicine, quality in a healthcare context is ‘he degree to which healthcare services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge’ (Institute of Medicine, as cited in AHRQ 2020a).

Why do We Measure?

Regular measuring of a system is essential to ensuring quality improvements. It allows a facility to determine the baseline level of current operational performance; establish goals for future performance; and monitor the impact of changes as they are made (AHRQ 2020b). When measured properly, metrics can guide every decision made to ultimately improve the end product, in this case, patient care.

Measurement and Quality Improvement Under the Strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards

Standard 2: The Organisation - Outcome 2.3: Accountability and quality systems of the strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards highlights the importance of maintaining a quality system that facilitates the continuous improvement of care and services (ACQSC 2024).

  • Action 2.3.1 (d) requires the organisation’s governing body to implement a quality system that monitors the organisation’s performance in providing high-quality care and services
  • Action 2.3.3 requires providers to review and improve their quality system routinely
  • Action 2.3.4 requires providers to report on their quality system’s performance routinely.

(ACQSC 2024)

What is the First Step to Measuring Quality?

To be able to determine whether goals have been met, it’s first necessary to define the desired end outcome. Without a clear goal established from the very start, it’s difficult to measure and recognise whether the changes that were made have resulted in improvements - or if they are just changes (Health Quality Ontario 2013).

Create a Measurement Plan

A measurement plan should contain the following (at a minimum):

  • A name
  • The measurement type
  • Why it’s needed
  • The method of data collection and sampling
  • And these questions:
    • How will the data be displayed and communicated?
    • Has baseline data been gathered?
    • Is there a set goal?

(Health Quality Ontario 2013)

The plan must be reviewed frequently. Rather than displaying data in a standard pre/post-implementation way, plot the data over time (for example, by month) for a clearer picture of how the changes are affecting outcomes. This process should be actively shared with staff to create momentum on an organisation-wide scale (Health Quality Ontario 2013).

Image of the word quality
In order to be able to determine whether goals have been met, it’s first necessary to define the desired end outcome

Quality Measurement Tools

An effective quality measurement tool must:

  • Be reliable (the tool should have the same outcome regardless of who is measuring)
  • Be objective
  • Be valid and reliable
  • Be standardised
  • Be evidenced-based
  • Not affect or distort results.

(AHRQ 2020a)

Examples of what could be measured for quality improvement within a healthcare facility include:

  • The time lapsed between transfer from the emergency department (ED) to an inpatient bed
  • The presence (or absence) of quality improvement programs
  • The number of nurses to the number of patients.

(AHRQ 2020a; Health Quality Ontario 2013)

Measurement Challenges

Six important considerations for designing measurement systems are:

  1. A patient’s experience of quality must be conceptualised as taking place over time; it is not stagnant.
  2. Responsiveness to the patient is a key aspect of quality.
  3. Broad factors such as the governance and management of a facility are likely to greatly influence quality.
  4. Quality can be considered as a construct driven by many different factors.
  5. Acknowledge that perceptions of the quality of care are an important factor of care utilisation, regardless of whether these perceptions are accurate.
  6. Approaches should be adapted to manage measurement challenges as they arise.

(Hanefeld et al. 2017)

Measurement and Quality Improvement in an Australian Context

The presence of measurement and quality improvement in the NSQHS Standards implies its importance and represents a gap present in Australian facilities and services. The NSQHS Standards identify two missions for facilities in terms of measurement and quality improvement:

1. The health service organisation should use organisation-wide quality improvement systems that:

  • Determine safety and quality measures, and monitor and report performance and outcomes
  • Determine areas for improvement in safety and quality
  • Implement and monitor strategies for improving safety and quality
  • Engage with consumers and the workforce to review safety and quality performance and systems.

(ACSQHC 2022b)

2. The organisation must ensure that timely reports on safety and quality systems and performance are provided to the following four parties:

  • The governing body
  • The workforce
  • Consumers/patients and the local community
  • Any other relevant health service organisations.

(ACSQHC 2022c)

Dart in bullseye on dart board

Conclusion

To up-scale health interventions, it’s necessary for facilities to recognise the multifaceted nature of quality of care. Technical quality must be increased, but equally crucial is better acceptability and a shift toward greater patient-centred care (Hanefeld et al. 2017).

The outcomes of care quality improvement should be tailored specifically to the needs of the community the facility exists in.


Topics

References

Test Your Knowledge

Question 1 of 3

True or false: The public’s perception of a facility’s quality is a barrier for accessing care.

For Teams
Assign to your staff

Assign mandatory training and keep all your records in-one-place.

Find out more
Meet your educator
Content Integrity
Ausmed strives for the highest level of content integrity and accuracy in our educational resources.
Last updated15 Apr 2024

Due for review15 Apr 2026
Cite this resource